论文部分内容阅读
基于CHIPs调研数据可知,农民工收入与其幸福感的关系同样表现出“Easterlin悖论”。实证研究结果表明:(1)对农民工幸福感起正向作用的并非家庭收入本身,而是扣除生活必要开支后的剩余部分,说明农民工幸福水平的提升并不止步于基本需求的满足。(2)农民工与城市居民间的收入差距严重损害其幸福感,但随着农民工收入的提高,其损害程度会逐步降低;与同村村民间的收入差距仅负向影响低收入者的幸福感。(3)收入对新老一代农民工幸福感的影响呈现出明显的代际差异,与新生代农民工相比,老一代农民工更关注经济因素的作用,与城市居民、同村村民间的收入差距均不利于老一代农民工幸福水平的提升;但对新生代农民工而言,与同村村民间的收入差距作用并不显著,说明他们并不将同村村民视为相对收入的参照对象。(4)当前,农民工的幸福感并非局限于单一的经济诉求,健康状况、教育水平、婚姻状况、流动方式等非经济因素同样作用明显。
Based on the CHIPs survey data, we can see that the relationship between migrant workers’ income and their happiness shows the same as “Easterlin Paradox.” The empirical results show that: (1) The positive effect on the happiness of migrant workers is not the household income itself, but the remaining part after deducting the necessary expenses for living, which shows that the improvement of the happiness of migrant workers does not stop at the satisfaction of basic needs. (2) The income gap between migrant workers and urban residents seriously jeopardizes their happiness, but the degree of damage will gradually decrease with the increase of migrant workers’ income; the income gap with other villagers only negatively affects the happiness of low-income earners sense. (3) The influence of income on the well-being of migrant workers in new and old generation shows obvious inter-generational difference. Compared with the new generation of migrant workers, the older generation of migrant workers are more concerned about the role of economic factors and the incomes of urban residents, However, for the new generation of migrant workers, the income gap with the village residents is not significant, indicating that they do not regard the villagers in the same village as the relative objects of relative income. (4) At present, the happiness of migrant workers is not confined to a single economic demand. Non-economic factors such as health status, educational level, marital status and flow pattern also play an obvious role.