以不法手段行使所有权该如何定性,无论在理论界还是司法实务界都颇有争议。如果立足于我国法律的相关规定,对我国夺取型财产罪的法益采取修正的所有权说,并结合最高人民法院公布的两则案例分析,可以得出合理结论。 How to exercise the ownership of illegally resorted to the nature of qualitative, whether in the theoretical community or judicial practice are controversial. If we base ourselves on the relevant provisions of our law and take the amended ownership of the legal interests of the crime of seizing property in our country, and combining the two case studies promulgated by the Supreme People’s Court, we can draw a reasonable conclusion.