论文部分内容阅读
诠释释《利未记》19章,关系到如何理解文本中的“圣洁”概念,不同学者理解的侧重点可能会有所不同。例如,犹太学者米路金将19章的主体背景定位在被掳前,认为19章的“圣洁”概念代表着伦理观念的普世性层面扩大了;但是卡米凯、戈斯腾伯格等联系18-20章的上下文脉,将19章的最后层的编修背景定位在被掳、甚至后被掳时期,认为19章的“圣洁”概念代表着伦理观念的普世性层面缩小了,它内部包含的仪式诫命,很可能与被掳一后被掳时期犹太教向内封闭和对外排斥的倾向相关联。这种完全不同的观点无疑增加了诠释经文的张力和困难。本文通过分析双方的不同观点,尝试对这些疑难给予一个初步的解决。
Interpretation of Chapter 19 of Leviticus concerns the understanding of the notion of “holiness” in the text, which may differ from one scholar’s point of understanding. For example, the Jewish scholar Mikelkin positions the subject background of Chapter 19 before the captivity, believing that the concept of “holiness” in Chapter 19 represents a universal extension of the concept of ethics; however, Camiquet, Gostemper In the context of chapter 18-20, the chapter traces the final compilation background of chapter 19 at the time of captivity and even post-exile, arguing that the concept of “holiness” in chapter 19 represents the universalization of ethical concepts The scale is reduced, and the ceremonial commandments contained within it are likely to be associated with the tendency of Judaism to be closed and excluded from the world in exile in captivity. This completely different perspective undoubtedly increases the tension and difficulty of interpreting Scripture. This article attempts to give a preliminary solution to these problems by analyzing the different perspectives of both parties.