论文部分内容阅读
我们对美国法律中的平等概念应该重新审视。以波西亚女子法学院的建立和法院对穆勒诉帕里贡案(穆勒诉俄勒冈州案)等案件的裁决为开端,美国女性对以两性间相同待遇为倡导的性别平等的追求,以及对改善女性地位的追求逐渐发展。尽管美国女性在选举、就业、财产方面已经获得了与男性法律上的平等地位,但对公民利益的分配仍然存在着严重的不平等。从某种程度上来说,这是由于美国人认为自治权的位阶高于平等权,因此打着自治更重要的幌子牺牲了大量的平等,而忽略了在这个共同生活的国家中,到处都充满触发式的依赖和永恒脆弱的事实。
We should revisit the notion of equality in American law. Starting with the establishment of the Law School for Women in Portia and the Court’s ruling on cases such as Muller v. Parigong (Muller v. Oregon) cases, the American women’s quest for gender equality advocated by the same treatment of both sexes and The pursuit of improving the status of women is gradually developing. Although American women have acquired legal equality with men in the fields of election, employment and property, there are still serious inequalities in the distribution of the interests of citizens. To some extent, this is due to the fact that Americans consider autonomy at a higher order than equality and sacrifice a great deal of equality under the more important pretext of self-government, ignoring the fact that in this co-living country everywhere Full of triggered dependency and eternal fragility.