论文部分内容阅读
一、立法背景在英国,1947年之前,股东针对公司控制人的压制行为唯一的保护是公平和公正的清算。1945年,公司法修订委员会(Cohen委员会)建议,应当有个法定的救济,针对压制行为允许更大范围的救济:“法院应当享有……赋予争议各方法院认为公平和公正的不论何种解决方法的权力。这种裁量权必须不受制约,因为要对每个案件的解决方法制定一个一般性的原则是不可能的。我们不认为法院在每个案件中都能被期望找到并赋予解决方法;但是我们的建议将给予法院一个目前所缺
I. Legislative Background In the United Kingdom, before 1947, the sole protection of shareholders against the corporate controllers’ repression was fair and just liquidation. In 1945, the Corporations Law Revision Committee (Cohen Commission) recommended that there should be a statutory remedy allowing a wider scope of remedies for repressive behavior: ”The courts should enjoy ... whatever the kind that the courts of the parties in dispute contend are fair and just The power to resolve the method must not be restricted because it is impossible to establish a general principle for the solution of each case and we do not think that the court can be expected to find and confer in each case The solution; however, our proposal will give the court a current shortage