论文部分内容阅读
在经济分析发展史上,价值与分配理论一直是经济学纯理论争论的核心。不论是强调社会关系的古典剩余传统,还是专注于技术分析的新古典供求传统,不同派别都对这一基础理论提出了完全不同的观点。新古典理论一系列逻辑悖论产生的原因,正是在于其完全回避了特定资本主义制度及其经济关系所致;相反,古典和马克思经济学则强调了现实资本主义经济体系中以剩余概念来表述资本与劳动对立关系的经济本质。从而表明,只有引入社会关系的古典剩余经济传统的分析方法,才能够得出对现实问题更有说服力的解释。
In the history of the development of economic analysis, the theory of value and distribution has always been the core of the debate on purely theoretical economics. Whether it is the classical remnants of tradition that emphasize social relations or the neoclassical tradition of supply and demand that focuses on technical analysis, different factions put forward entirely different views on this basic theory. The reason for a series of logical paradoxes of neoclassical theory lies precisely in its complete avoidance of the specific capitalist system and its economic relations. On the contrary, classical and Marxist economics emphasize that in the realistic capitalist economy, the remaining concepts Representing the Economic Essence of Antagonistic Relationship between Capital and Labor. This shows that only by introducing the classical analytical method of the remaining economic traditions of social relations can we come to a more convincing explanation of the reality.