论文部分内容阅读
[目的]了解云南省玉溪市红塔区和澄江县居民对伤寒、副伤寒的认知、态度和行为(KAP)的差异,为开展伤寒副伤寒干预评价提供依据。[方法]按照分层随机抽样的原则,选定红塔592人、澄江590人,经由培训的调查员采用统一的调查问卷以询问的方式进行调查。[结果]红塔和澄江被调查居民对伤寒、副伤寒的相关知识有一定了解,但不很全面,总知晓率都不高。两地在回答有关问题时存在差异,红塔整体上要好于澄江;在伤寒副伤寒防病态度和行为方面,红塔和澄江居民对问题的回答也有差异,红塔同样好于澄江。[结论](1)加强红塔和澄江两地居民伤寒副伤寒防治知识的宣传和教育很有必要;(2)在两地宣教伤寒、副伤寒防治知识上应采取不同的方式;(3)对红塔和澄江居民喝生水,喜吃凉菜的生活习惯应加以纠正,对制作不洁净凉菜的餐馆和摊点必要时实施行政干预。
[Objective] To understand the difference of cognition, attitude and behavior (KAP) of typhoid and paratyphoid among residents in Hongta and Chengjiang of Yuxi City, Yunnan Province, and to provide basis for carrying out the evaluation of typhoid and paratyphoid fever. [Method] According to the principle of stratified random sampling, 592 people in Hongta and 590 people in Chengjiang were selected. The trained investigators used the unified questionnaire to conduct inquiry. [Result] The residents surveyed by Hongta and Chengjiang had certain knowledge about the related knowledge of typhoid fever and paratyphoid fever, but they were not very comprehensive and the total awareness rate was not high. There were differences between the two places in answering relevant questions. Hongta was generally better than Chengjiang in terms of answering the relevant questions. In respect of the attitude and behavior of typhoid and paratyphoid fever prevention, the residents of Hongta and Chengjiang answered the questions differently. Hongta was also better than Chengjiang. [Conclusion] (1) It is necessary to strengthen publicity and education on the knowledge of prevention and treatment of typhoid and paratyphoid fever among residents in Hongta and Chengjiang. (2) Different ways should be adopted in educating the knowledge of prevention and treatment of typhoid fever and paratyphoid fever in both places; (3) Hongta and Chengjiang residents drink raw water, like to eat cold dish habits should be corrected, the production of dirty dishes and stalls if necessary, the implementation of administrative intervention.