渎职侵权犯罪基于其犯罪主体的特殊性,导致检察机关在查办渎职侵权案件时,收集、固定证据存在较大困难,而新刑诉法修正案的出台,明确了渎职侵权犯罪有罪证据的举证责任,明确了证据确实充分的证明标准,完善了非法证据排除规则,如何收集证据,如何杜绝非法证据、避免瑕疵证据等,这一系列问题都是摆在反渎职侵权工作面前的新要求。 Due to the particularity of the main body of crime, decriminalization of infringement of duty results in procuratorial organs having difficulty in collecting and fixing evidence when investigating cases of malfeasance and infringement. However, the introduction of the amendment of new Criminal Procedure Law clarifies the burden of proof in the criminal evidence of dereliction of duty , Clarifying the evidence that the evidence is indeed sufficient, improving the rules for excluding illegal evidence, how to collect evidence, how to put an end to illegal evidence, and avoiding evidence of defects, all these new issues are the new requirements placed before anti-malpractice work.