论文部分内容阅读
我国司法考试答案异议制已实施了多年,对考生维权产生了积极作用;但是,异议制并非法定程序,目前实行的异议制忽略了对于异议的回应,人们无从知悉司法部及相关方面对各界提出异议的试题答案如何审查和最终得出何种结论,缺少透明度。克服异议制诸多缺陷的最佳办法是将异议制进一步推进为听证制,听证制度是现代行政程序法的核心制度。对司法考试答案异议实行听证制可以将司法考试答案的异议和回应纳入法定程序,更有利于该过程的公开公正,推动司法考试制度更加完善,并提升我国的政府信用。
However, the opposition system is not a statutory procedure. At present, the opposition system neglects the response to the opposition. People have no way of knowing that the judiciary and related parties have made suggestions Objection questions how to examine the answer and what conclusions, the lack of transparency. The best way to overcome many defects of the opposition system is to further promote the opposition system as a hearing system. The hearing system is the core system of the modern administrative procedure law. Objection to the judicial examination Hearing system can bring the objections and responses of the judicial examination answers into legal procedure, be more conducive to the openness and fairness of the process, promote the judicial examination system more perfect, and enhance the government credit of our country.