人们通过换种身份、换个地位来进行换位思考,以了解对方所需,理解对方所想。然而这种简单的换位方式是否真的奏效?古语有云:子非鱼,安知鱼之乐?举一个简单的例子,让一个道±与和尚进行换位思考,无论道士怎么变换位置,都无法理解和尚为什么信的是佛而不是道,因为道士与和尚的思维方式天差地别。现实生活中,很多领导也会试着以员工的身份来思考问题,但结果却往往不是员工想要的,因为领导虽然把自己的身份假想 People change their status by changing their status and changing their status to understand each other’s needs and understand each other’s thoughts. However, this simple transposition is really effective? The old saying goes: the non-fish, Anzhi fish music? Give a simple example, so that a Tao and monks empathy, no matter how Taoist change position, Can not understand why the monks believe the Buddha is not the Tao, because Taoist and monk’s way of thinking bad day. In real life, many leaders try to think about the problem as an employee, but the result is often not what employees want because the leader thinks of his own identity