论文部分内容阅读
[目的]了解大学生应对方式与焦虑的关系。[方法]对220名大学生进行应对方式问卷和zung自评焦虑量表(SAS)的测试。[结果]①根据焦虑自评量表得分将被试分为无焦虑组与焦虑两组,两组被试在应对方式各维度上差异均有统计学意义。②对应对方式的各因子与焦虑的两组进行相关分析,解决问题应对方式与无焦虑组和焦虑组均呈负相关;自责应对方式与焦虑组呈正相关;幻想应对方式与无焦虑组呈正相关;合理化应对方式与无焦虑组呈负相关,与焦虑组呈正相关。[结论]采取自责、幻想、退避和合理化应对方式的大学生更有可能存在焦虑症状。
[Objective] To understand the relationship between college students’ coping style and anxiety. [Methods] 220 college students were investigated by coping style questionnaire and zung self-rating anxiety scale (SAS). [Results] ①According to the self-rating anxiety scale, the subjects were divided into two groups: anxiety-free group and anxiety-free group. There was significant difference between the two groups in all dimensions of coping style. (2) Correlation analysis between each factor of coping style and anxiety group showed that there was a negative correlation between coping style and anxiety-free and anxiety-free groups; self-reproach coping style was positively correlated with anxiety group; fantasy coping style was positively correlated with anxiety-free group Correlation; Rational coping style was negatively correlated with no anxiety group and positively correlated with anxiety group. [Conclusion] Undergraduates taking self-blame, fantasy, retreat and rationalization are more likely to have anxiety symptoms.