一文明的野蛮人当谈论到文明与野蛮的辩证关系时,人们最常引用的是“奥斯威辛之后写诗是野蛮的”。①第三帝国期间所犯下的大量暴行如果可以在价值论上歪曲解释为正当的,我们也就可以认为如此诠释本身也是野蛮的。实际上,并非仅仅因为奥斯威辛,所谓“科学的”诠释总是会表现出某种形式的野蛮性。 A civilized savage When talking about the dialectical relationship between civilization and barbarism, one of the most commonly quoted is “writing barbarism after Auschwitz”. ① If the atrocities committed during the Third Reich can be justified by the distortion of axiological theory, then we can think of such an interpretation as barbarous. In fact, not only because of Auschwitz, the so-called “scientific” interpretation will always show some form of barbarism.