《刑法修正案(九)》第35条新增设了虚假诉讼罪,将“以捏造的事实提起民事诉讼,妨害司法秩序或者严重侵害他人合法权益的”行为纳入刑法,独立成罪。然而,法初立,司法实践中在具体适用该条款时,可能会面临诸多问题。虚假诉讼行为的主体是否仅限于诉讼中的原告?虚假诉讼行为是否要求行为人具有非法占有的目的?虚假诉讼是否仅限于民事诉讼程序中?以及条文中定罪标准模糊、共犯规定不明等问题。故此,本文通过对《刑法修正案(九)》第35条的分析,就虚假诉讼罪在司法实践具体运用中可能出现的以上问题予以论述并阐述自己的观点。 Article 35 of the Amendment to the Criminal Law (IX) adds a new crime of false prosecution and criminalizes the criminal act of bringing a civil lawsuit, obstructing the judicial order or seriously infringing the lawful rights and interests of others into a criminal offense. However, the law, the judicial practice in the specific application of the clause, may face many problems. Is the subject of the false action limited to the plaintiff in the lawsuit? Does the false action require that the actor have the purpose of illegally possessing? Is the false action limited to civil procedure only? Therefore, through the analysis of Article 35 of Amendment 9 to the Criminal Law, this article discusses the above problems that may arise in the specific application of judicial practice in the crime of false prosecution and expounds its own views.