论文部分内容阅读
明代嘉靖年间王忬因向权相严嵩献古画赝品惹怒严氏父子而终致灾难的“伪画致祸”事,见载于《明史》、《明史纪事本末》等史书和《味水轩日记》、《万历野获编》等名人笔记,流传了近四百年。吴晗先生曾撰文将此事的真实性子以否认,后人多从其说,而未见撰文置疑者。本文在梳理万历年间有关伪画致祸文字的源流变化的同时,将沈德符、李日华笔记和明代他人笔记相参证,再与王世贞《弇州山人四部稿》、《续稿》所载相关文字对比、印证,发现吴晗先生的文章只否定了清中叶之后有关《清明上河图》致祸说的衍生品,而未否定“伪画致祸”本事的真实性,未否定《清明上河图》之外的伪画致祸的可能性。近来,发现新的资料,使上述结论进一步得以证实。
Wang Ming in the Ming Dynasty Jiajing years because of the right to Yan Song offer ancient paintings fake anger Yan’s father and son and eventually lead to disaster “pseudo-painting disaster”, as contained in “Ming Dynasty”, “History of Ming and Qing Dynasties” and other history books and “ Wei Shuixuan diary ”,“ Wanli wild series ”celebrity notes, circulated for nearly four hundred years. Mr. Wu Han wrote an article that denied the authenticity of the matter and claimed that the posterity did not say anything. This article combs the origins and changes of fake painful words in Wanli years, and at the same time, it combines the notes of Shen Defu and Li Rihua with those of other Ming dynasty witnesses, and then compares them with Wang Shizhen’s Four Manuscripts in Pizhou, Relevant text comparison, confirmation and found that Mr. Wu Han’s article only denied the “clear river on the river map” after the end of the Qing Dynasty derivative products, but did not deny the “pseudo-painting disaster” ability of the true, did not deny “clear On the river map ”outside the possibility of false paintings. Recently, the discovery of new information makes the above conclusion further confirmed.