刊物的优劣,最关键取决于稿件的质量,因而每一个有责任心的编辑都会使出浑身解数,以期组来高质量的文稿。然而,要经常组到好稿并非易事:一、吃准定位同一篇稿,甲刊视为劣稿,而乙刊则可能视之为宝,这样的情况并不鲜见。例如,一个面向基层小学教师的教学参考期刊,不太会欢迎那些对某个字词钻研得很深的文章,也不太会欢迎那些超越教学大纲节外生枝的争鸣文章;而这些文章在某些语言学方面的学术期刊,或者学术性较强的教育类期刊中也许会大受欢迎。同一稿遭遇迥然不同并非编辑眼光有失客观,而是因各种刊物定位不同,刊物受到读者群的制约,对稿件取舍必然有不同的标准。因此,一名优秀的编辑要想组得质量高的稿件必须真正领会刊物的办刊方 The pros and cons of publications, the most crucial depends on the quality of manuscripts, so every responsible editor will do their best to expect the group to high-quality manuscripts. However, it is not an easy task to keep a good group of people on a regular basis. First, it is not uncommon for you to target the same manuscript. For example, a pedagogical reference journals for grassroots primary school teachers would not welcome welcoming articles that deeply study a word, and less likely to welcome contentious ones that transcend the syllabus of extracurricular writing; in some languages Academic academic journals, or academic journals may be very popular educational journals. The same manuscript encountered a very different is not an editor’s point of view is not objective, but because of different positioning of different publications, publications by the reader group constraints, there must be different standards for manuscripts. Therefore, a good editor who wants to organize a high-quality manuscript must really understand the issuers