论文部分内容阅读
司法和谐命题的提出,促使我们对一些司法问题做一些思考。第一个问题是:司法和谐是一种目的还是一种手段?这一问题的提出是针对我们原来所提出的司法目的而言的。前几年,最高法院将司法目的定位为公正与效率,还召开了一次大型的全国性专题研讨会。笔者认为司法还是应以实现公正作为它的最高目的和最终目的。针对这样的目的来谈司法和谐,司法和谐就是一种手段,是为实现司法公正而为的一种手段。前几年我们提到的司法体制也是一种手段。司法体制、司法独立包括现在提出的司法和谐都应当从手段意义上来理解,都是为实现司法公正这样一个司法的最高目的和最终目的所服务的,所必备的,这是司法和谐的定位问题。当然,我们也不妨从阶段意义上和过程意义上将司法体制、
The proposition of judicial harmony proposition prompted us to make some thinking on some judicial issues. The first question is: Is judicial harmony an end or a means? The question has been raised in the light of the judicial purposes that we originally proposed. A few years ago, the Supreme Court positioned the purpose of justice as fair and efficient. A large-scale national symposium was also held. I believe that the judiciary should still be to achieve justice as its highest goal and ultimate goal. Judicial harmony for such a purpose, judicial harmony is a means for justice to achieve a means. The judicial system we mentioned a few years ago is also a means. Judicial system, judicial independence, including the judicial harmony now proposed should all be understood in terms of means, all of which are necessary to serve for the ultimate purpose and ultimate goal of judicial justice. This is the issue of the judicial harmony . Of course, we may also wish to stage the sense of the process and the judicial system,