当前有的小学想通过记分评比的办法来搞好学生的纪律,这种主观愿望虽是好的,但其作法是不符合教育原则的。纪律记分的范围很广:晨间自习、朝会、集合、上课(每堂都记)、课间操等都记分;以得分的多少每周一小评,每月一大评,作为评比纪律好坏的依据。采用这种办法,从表面看确实也能起到一时的刺激作用。孩子们为着争取班级的集体荣誉,为了争取在全校评为第一,虽然他们也能相互约束,尽量克制自已,但纪律记分评比究竟起了些什么作用呢?这个问题就我个人意见提出来与大家商讨。 At present, some primary schools want to do a good job of student discipline through scoring and assessment. Although this subjective desire is good, its practice is not in conformity with the principle of education. The scope of disciplinary scores is very wide: morning self-study, North Korea meeting, assembly, class (recorded in each lesson), class breaks, etc. Scores are scored on a weekly basis, a small monthly review, a large monthly rating, as a good measure of discipline The basis. Using this approach, it does seem to have a temporary stimulus on the surface. In order to fight for the collective honor of the class, the children are trying to win the first place in the school. Although they can also restrain each other and exercise restraint, what exactly does the discipline score play have? This question has been raised in my opinion. Discuss with everyone.