论文部分内容阅读
通过对各个法律效率评价标准进行评述,提出法律成本收益分析法是测算法律效率的可操作的有效标准。在理论上将法律成本进一步分解为法律制定成本与法律实施成本,其中,法律制定成本属于沉没成本,不应纳入法律效率的评价模型之中;法律实施成本包括脱序成本、第二类摩擦成本及失益成本。对于法律收益,提出以法律目标为指引的确定方法。本文同时给出每一类法律成本及收益的具体测度方案,并构建出法律效率量化的理论框架,最终通过森林采伐限额管理制度验证了该理论框架的可操作性,从而使得法律效率评价成为可能。
By reviewing the evaluation criteria of each legal efficiency, this paper puts forward that the legal cost benefit analysis method is an operable and effective standard for calculating the legal efficiency. In theory, the legal costs are further decomposed into the cost of legal formulation and the cost of legal implementation. Among them, the cost of lawmaking belongs to sunk cost and should not be included in the evaluation model of legal efficiency. The cost of law enforcement includes the disassembly cost, the second type of frictional cost And cost of benefits. For the legal benefits, put forward the legal target as a guideline to determine the method. At the same time, this paper gives a concrete measure of each kind of legal costs and benefits, constructs the theoretical framework of legal efficiency quantification, and finally verifies the operability of the theoretical framework through the forest cutting quota management system, making it possible to evaluate the legal efficiency .