论文部分内容阅读
南宋朱熹的高徒陈淳作《北溪字义》有训诂之嫌,考据家戴震作《孟子字义疏证》有发挥己意之嫌。然而两人分别处于宋学、清学之中,治学虽有类似,但其解义亦有很大差别。本文主要分析他们对共同的若干概念的不同解释理路。因为“道”“理”“性”三者在两者体系中都是最为关键的概念,所以我们着重对这三个概念进行比较。结果我们可以看出两个人立足于不同的为学传统和重心:陈淳继承朱熹理学,“天理”自然最为重要;而戴震反对当时的理学,要将“理”回到先秦的“理”的意义——“条理”上去。
In the Southern Song Dynasty, Zhu Xi’s high disciple Chen Chun was suspected of “Beixi ZiYi”. His research on Dai Jian’s “Mencius Word Meaning ShuZhen” had its own meaning. However, both of them are in the Song and Qing dynasties, respectively, though there are similarities in their scholastic abilities, their definitions are quite different. This article mainly analyzes their different interpretations of common concepts. Because “” “” “” is the most crucial concept in both systems, we focus on the comparison of these three concepts. As a result, we can see that two people are based on different traditions and centers of gravity: Chen Chun inherited Zhu Xi’s Confucianism and Nature was the most important. Dai Zhen opposed the Confucian philosophy at that time and wanted to return The meaning of “reason” - “order” up.