论文部分内容阅读
1986年1月24日,《人民日报》发表了一篇楚图南纪念胡愈之的文章,其中提到:在“文革”的混乱时刻,愈之同志优心忡忡地约同杨东莼和周世钊同志上书主席要求见面。毛主席派人接见了三位同志。整整两个半天,他们都很诚挚地,也是很沉痛地,对当时全国带有关键性的重大问题作了痛切的进言。愈之同志说的是发扬民主、广开言路,杨东莼同志说的是青年问题,周世钊同志说的是教育问题。这一段文字也使读者产生了一些问题:什么时候胡愈之等三人向毛主席派的什么人谈了哪些内容?这次“进言”是如何引起的?赴京奔丧悲国事1972年夏季,离林彪摔死在蒙古的温都尔汗还不到一年,这位被中共“九大”党章规定为接班人的如此下场,使不少干部、知识分子都从“文革”初期的政治狂热转为冷静沉思。知识界的一些勤于思考的代表人物则站在历史的高度思考中国的命运和前途,虽然提出的问题不尽相同,但有一点是共同的,这就是:尽快结束“文革”以来的混乱局面。而结
On January 24, 1986, “People’s Daily” published an article on Chu Tunan commemorating Hu Yuzhi, in which it was mentioned that during the confusion of the “Cultural Revolution”, the more Comrades you were, the more you were concerned about Yang Dongxuan and Comrade Zhou Shi Zhao Chairman asked to meet. Chairman Mao sent people to meet with three comrades. For exactly two and a half days, they all earnestly and deeply painfully made painstaking comments on the major and major issues that were going on in the country at that time. What Comrades Say Is Carrying Forward Democracy, Expanding the Path, Comrade Yang Dongli said that it is a youth problem, and Comrade Zhou Shi Zhao said it is an issue of education. This passage also raises a number of questions for the readers: When did the three people such as Hu Yu talked about what was sent by Chairman Mao? What happened to this “Incentives”? In summer, less than a year after Lin Biao died in Wendu Khan, Mongolia, the “fate of the successor” stipulated by the CPC’s “nine major” party constitution has enabled many cadres and intellectuals to change their terms from the “Cultural Revolution ”The initial political fanatic into calm thinking. Some diligent and thoughtful representatives of the intelligentsia think about the fate and future of China from a historical perspective. Although the issues raised are different, one thing in common is that as soon as the end of the “Cultural Revolution” Chaotic situation. And knot