论文部分内容阅读
语言模式追求精确、稳定和意义,而语用模式则强调表述的节奏、强度、功能和流动性,并以其独特方式摒弃了语言模式的内在规定性,代之以环境属性,且赋予表述更多的灵活度与控制力,非常符合艺术欣赏与创造的直觉本质,故而能产生更好的艺术教育效果,达到更高的艺术教育目标。因此,要改变当下艺术教育中普遍存在的受教者艺术想象力和创造性受阻的问题,就必须改变其话语模式,变语言为语用,以适应当前社会发展的需要。
The language model pursues accuracy, stability and meaning while the pragmatic model emphasizes the rhythm, intensity, function and fluidity of the expression, abandoning the inherent stipulation of the language model in its unique way, substituting environmental attributes and giving more expression Many degrees of flexibility and control, very much in line with the intuitive nature of art appreciation and creation, it can produce better artistic education, to achieve higher artistic education goals. Therefore, to change the ubiquitous problem of art imagination and creativity hindered by current art education, we must change the mode of discourse and change language into pragmatic to meet the needs of current social development.