论文部分内容阅读
目的:探析子宫肌瘤手术的麻醉方式选择。方法:选取我院2014年1月至2016年4月期间行子宫肌瘤手术的73例患者为研究对象,根据麻醉方式不同分为两组,即甲组(n=36,给予硬膜外麻醉)、乙组(n=37,给予静脉全身麻醉),比较两组患者的麻醉效果。结果:在麻醉起效时间、局麻药物用量、阻滞完全时间方面,两组对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。乙组麻醉优良率为97.3%,明显高于甲组的83.3%,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在子宫肌瘤手术中,静脉全身麻醉的临床效果要明显优于硬膜外麻醉,是一种值得临床全面应用与推广的麻醉方式。
Objective: To explore the choice of anesthesia for uterine fibroid surgery. Methods: A total of 73 patients underwent uterine myoma surgery from January 2014 to April 2016 in our hospital were divided into two groups according to the mode of anesthesia: group A (n = 36, epidural anesthesia ), Group B (n = 37, giving intravenous general anesthesia) and comparing the anesthetic effects of the two groups. Results: There were significant differences between the two groups in the onset time of anesthesia, the amount of local anesthetic drug and the complete block time (P <0.05). The excellent and good rate of anesthesia in group B was 97.3%, which was significantly higher than that in group A (83.3%), with significant difference (P <0.05). Conclusion: In uterine fibroid surgery, the clinical effect of intravenous general anesthesia is significantly better than that of epidural anesthesia, which is an anesthetic method worthy of clinical application and promotion.