汉语无形态,曾经被认为是落后的表现。当这一谬论和偏见受到批判后,有人又提出语言有无形态都一样,半斤八两,没有质的差别,也没有科学性的差异。一些语言学著作,教科书宜称:“语法结构不能分优劣。”“没有理由去用某一种语法范畴的有无去评价一种语言的高低,进步和落后”,“语言没有优与劣,先进与落后……之分。” Chinese no morphology, once considered backward performance. After this fallacy and prejudice were criticized, some people proposed that there be no linguistic forms and no details. There are no qualitative differences and no scientific differences. Some linguistics, textbooks should say: “Grammatical structure can not be divided merits.” “There is no reason to use a grammatical category to evaluate the level of a language, progress and backwardness,” “language is no good or bad , Advanced and backward ... ... points. ”