在《由汉简“方”与“幡”看汉代边卒的文化学习》一文中,作者将兵器“有方”释为书写工具“方”、将兵器“幡”释为拭觚之“幡”、将“画方矢”释为刻书刀、将书写工具“方”与“觚”释为同一之物、认为“札”仅为书写用的木片的名称。上述说法均值得商榷。此外,上文中所引用的部分材料和一些语言组织也有商榷之必要。 In his article “Culture and Learning for the Died of the Han Dynasty” by Han Fang “Fang” and “Banner”, the author interprets the weapon “Fangfang” as the writing instrument “Fang” and the weapon “Banner” as the “banner ”,“ Painting square ”as a carving knife, the writing tools“ square ”and“ 觚 ”as the same thing, that“ Sapporo ”is only the name of the wood for writing. These statements are debatable. In addition, some of the materials quoted above and some language organizations are also open to debate.