论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】汽车本身是一个相对封闭的空间,驾驶者精神高度集中,被告人对行驶中汽车实施砸车抢夺财物的行为,必然会给驾驶者带来恐惧、紧张的心理刺激,实质上对其造成了精神上的强制。被告人为实施抢夺行为而携带并在抢夺过程中使用了凶器的,即使凶器没有外露或被害人没有看见,也不影响抢夺行为转化为抢劫行为。结合宽严相济的刑事政策,这一砸车抢钱行为较普通的飞车行抢具有更严重的社会危害性,应依法从严惩处。因此,认定被告人的行为构成抢劫罪。
The purpose of the referee The car itself is a relatively closed space, a high degree of concentration of the driver’s mind, the defendant on the driving car pounding cars rob property, will inevitably give the driver fear, nervous psychological stimulation, in essence, It caused mental coercion. The defendant carried the robbery and used the weapon in the process of robbing, even if the weapon was not exposed or the victim did not see it, it did not affect the conversion of robbery into robbery. Combined with the criminal policy of temper justice with mercy, the smashing of money grabbing robberies has more serious social harmfulness than the ordinary speeding robbery and should be punished severely according to law. Therefore, the determination of the accused constitutes robbery.