论文部分内容阅读
卢卡奇严厉地批判了资产阶级思想的二律背反困境,要求在主客体的原初的同一性中重构对象性形式。与他的物化批判相似,超越论现象学不仅对意识的物化现象进行了彻底地反思和还原,而且在自身同一的绝对存在中以理性的方式重建了从对象化到物化的发生过程。尽管胡塞尔的思的哲学与卢卡奇的社会批判理论之间存在着深层的思想对峙,但这丝毫不妨碍他们共同成为20世纪西方哲学的最重要的创建者。
Lukacs severely criticized the dilemma of bourgeois ideology and demanded that the object form be reconstructed in the original identity of the subject and the object. Similar to his materialistic critique, transcendental phenomenology not only thoroughly reflects on and rehabilitates the materialized phenomena of consciousness, but also reconstructs the process from objectification to materialization rationally in the absolute existence of oneself. Although there is a deep ideological confrontation between Husserl’s philosophy and Lukacs’s theory of social criticality, this in no way prevents them from jointly becoming the most important founders of Western philosophy in the 20th century.