论文部分内容阅读
目的了解留守儿童在一般同伴和亲密好友社交情境下的解释偏向特点。方法选取320名留守儿童为研究组,276名普通儿童为控制组,施测儿童版两可社交情境解释问卷。结果留守儿童的消极解释偏向显著高于控制组(t=2.52,P<0.05),积极解释偏向显著低于控制组(t=-4.21,P<0.001);留守儿童指向自身的消极解释偏向显著高于控制组(t=2.66,P<0.01;t=3.58,P<0.001);留守儿童在亲密好友情境比在一般同伴情境下更少产生消极解释(t=5.77,P<0.001),更多地产生积极解释(t=-4.19,P<0.001)。结论留守儿童存在明显的消极解释偏向,缺乏积极解释偏向;好友关系在一定程度上抑制消极解释并促进积极解释的产生。
Objective To understand the explanatory bias of left-behind children in social situations of general peers and close friends. Methods 320 left-behind children were selected as research group and 276 normal children as control group. Children’s version of two social situations were used to explain the questionnaire. Results The negative explanations of left-behind children were significantly higher than that of control group (t = 2.52, P <0.05), positive explanations bias was significantly lower than that of control group (t = -4.21, P <0.001) (T = 2.66, P <0.01; t = 3.58, P <0.001). Left-behind children had less negative explanations in the close friends’ situation than in the general peer (t = 5.77, P <0.001) Multiple positive explanations (t = -4.19, P <0.001). Conclusion Left-behind children have obvious negative explanations bias, lack of positive interpretation of bias; good friends relationship to a certain extent, inhibit the negative interpretation and promote the positive interpretation.