论文部分内容阅读
一、追溯性的拷问:缘何法定?(一)隐到显、强到弱的渐变趋势1993年制定的《公司法》不仅将法定代表人的选任及职权范围从过去隐性、含蓄的表达推向了显性且强势的境地;同时,也因这种僵化机械的法定,使其从维护交易安全的初衷渐渐走向了反面,如果只认可董事长一人对公司的代表权,那么其他董事或高管的所为则不能当然约束公司,这对于与公司发生交易的第三人来说无疑是个陷阱。可以说,1993年《公司法》所设计的法定代表人制度注定为“法定性”的盛极而衰埋下了伏笔。鉴此,2005年修订《公司法》
First, the retrospective torture: Why legal? (A) to the apparent, strong to weak gradual trend The “Company Law” formulated in 1993 not only the legal representative of the elective and terms of reference from the past hidden, implicit expression of push At the same time, because of this rigid statutory machinery, making it from the original intention of maintaining the security of the transaction to the opposite, if only recognized one of the chairman of the company’s representation, then the other directors or high What the tube does not, of course, restrain the company, which is undoubtedly a trap for a third person who deals with the company. It can be said that the system of the legal representative designed by the Company Law in 1993 is destined to be a foreshadowing of the “statutory nature.” In view of this, in 2005 amended the “Company Law”