布哈林在一九三八年三月所谓右派和托派联盟案中的表现,对后人来说,始终是一个难解之谜。尽管他用了抽象承认,具体否认的办法,证明自己是个没有从事间谍活动的间谍,没有背叛行为的叛徒,不从事反革命活动的反革命分子。但他毕竟承认了加于他头上的种种“污秽”,各种各样的莫须有的罪名。尽管这在三十年代的审判中已经是难能可贵的了,并且他所能做到的也只能是这些了。 他没有像他的难友克列斯廷斯基那样利用法庭这个讲坛去翻供,去公开揭露非法的逼供。克列斯廷斯基在出庭受审的时候,公然站出来否认对 The performance of Bukharin in the so-called rightist and Trotskyist coalition talks in March 1938 has always been a mystery to future generations. Although he used abstract recognition and concrete denial, he proved himself to be a spy who did not engage in espionage, a traitor who did not betray him, and a counterrevolutionary who did not engage in counter-revolutionary activities. But after all, he admitted all kinds of “filth” and all kinds of unwarranted charges that were added to his head. Although this has been commendable in the thirties trial, and all he can do is that. He did not use the tribunal’s forum as his cronies Kostinsky did to provide for the public disclosure of illegal confessions. When Klestinski stood trial in court, he publicly denied it