论文部分内容阅读
我国司法机关在办理刑事案件过程中,应分工负责,互相配合,互相制约。这是被宪法所明确规宪的并且在刑事诉讼法中具体体现的一个诉讼基本原则。当前诉讼法学界对“互相制约”的法律含义在理解上是不尽一致的。大致有以下几种观点:①认为公、检、法三机关之间的制约可分为广、狭两义。狭义仅指在案件实体处理方面的制约;广义则还包括程序方面的制约。②认为依法办事是实质,互相制约是体现这一实质内容的手段。③认为制约包涵两个方面的内容。不仅对无辜公民毫无根据地追究刑事责任的要制约,而且对违法犯罪行为放任不管的也要制约。
In the process of handling criminal cases, our judicial organs should be responsible for division of labor, cooperate with each other and restrict each other. This is a fundamental principle of litigation explicitly stipulated by the Constitution and embodied in the Code of Criminal Procedure. The legal meaning of “mutual restraint” in current litigation jurisprudence is not completely understood. Generally have the following views: ① that the public, prosecutors, the constraints between the three agencies can be divided into broad, narrow sense. The narrow sense only refers to the constraints in the handling of the case entity; broad also includes procedural constraints. ② that the law is substantive, mutual restraint is the means to reflect this substance. ③ that the constraints contain two aspects. Not only is it necessary to hold the criminal responsibility unfounded for innocent citizens, but it also restricts whether or not to commit any criminal offenses.