论文部分内容阅读
法治化反腐和冤假错案防范的有效实现,需要审判人员对腐败犯罪事实证据的精准审查。通过对腐败犯罪案件中瑕疵证据和非法证据的类型分析,提出“程序违法程度、证据的客观性和程序正义”作为腐败犯罪非法证据和瑕疵证据的界分标准。从而对非法言词证据、非法物证、书证以及瑕疵证据适用不同的排除规则,为有效实现法治化反腐的目标提供参考依据。
The effective realization of the precautionary measures against legal corruption and unjustly wrongful cases needs the accurate examination of the trial evidence of the factual evidence of corruption. Through the analysis of the types of flaws and illegal evidences in corruption crimes, “the degree of procedural illegality, the objectivity of evidence and the procedural justice” are put forward as the standard of demarcation of the illegitimate evidence and the flawed evidence of corruption crimes. Thus different rules of exclusion can be applied to the evidence of illegitimate words, illegal physical evidences, documentary evidences and flaws, so as to provide reference for effectively realizing the goal of legalizing anti-corruption.