论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨不同手术方式对尿道下裂的临床疗效。方法:对我院收治的尿道下裂患者根据其不同手术方式将其分为A组、B组以及C组,其中A组采用Duckett术进行治疗,B组采用Snodgrass术进行治疗,C组患者采用阴囊中线皮肤岛状皮瓣法进行治疗。结果:A、B两组患者手术成功率比较无统计学差异性(P>0.05);阴囊中线皮肤岛状皮瓣法术其出现并发症的机会明显低于其他两组(P<0.05)。结论:不同术式对尿道下裂进行治疗,各术式各具有点,在临床运用中应当考虑患者的综合情况进行制定相应的手术方式进行治疗,从而有效改善患者预后。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of different surgical methods on hypospadias. Methods: The patients with hypospadias treated in our hospital were divided into group A, group B and group C according to their different surgical methods. Among them, group A was treated with Duckett technique, group B was treated with Snodgrass technique, and group C was treated with Scrotal midline skin island flap method for treatment. Results: There was no significant difference in the success rate of operation between A and B groups (P> 0.05). The chances of complications in sciatic midline skin flap were significantly lower than those in other two groups (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Different surgical procedures are used to treat hypospadias. Each procedure has its own points. In clinical practice, patients should be considered for comprehensive surgical treatment to improve their prognosis.