最近,笔者关注到在美国“337调查”中国17家通用耗材企业落败的新闻报道,成为了各大网站和媒体关注的焦点。在知识产权争端领域,尤其是中美之间的知识产权争端和摩擦不断,西方国家通过“贸易保护”、“中国威胁”和“中国产品质量问题”等各种手段,不断的给中国政府增加压力,减少贸易顺差。这次“337调查”也正是美国国际贸易委员会利用日本爱普生公司排斥中国产品,执行贸易保护的典型案例,这也属于正常的国际贸易纠纷。但是,笔者注意到 Recently, the author concerned about the news reports that 17 general-purpose consumables enterprises in China were “lost” in the “337 Investigation” in the United States and became the focus of major websites and media. In the fields of intellectual property disputes, especially the disputes and frictions in intellectual property between China and the United States, the western countries have adopted various means such as “trade protection ”, “China threat ” and “China’s product quality problems Constantly increase the pressure on the Chinese government to reduce the trade surplus. This ”337 investigation " It is also the United States International Trade Commission to use Japan’s Epson company to exclude Chinese products, the implementation of trade protection is a typical case, which is also a normal international trade disputes. However, I noticed