论文部分内容阅读
目的:对应用瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼两种药物对接受手术治疗的急诊外伤疾病患者实施麻醉的临床效果进行对比研究。方法选择我院收治的接受手术治疗的急诊外伤疾病患者82例,随机分为对照组和观察组,平均每组41例。采用瑞芬太尼对对照组患者实施麻醉;采用舒芬太尼对观察组患者实施麻醉。对比两组急诊外伤疾病手术麻醉效果、麻醉药物原因导致的不良事件、术后完全苏醒时间。结果观察组患者急诊外伤疾病手术麻醉效果明显优于对照组,组间差异显著(P<0.05);麻醉药物原因导致的不良事件明显少于对照组,组间差异显著(P<0.05);术后完全苏醒时间明显短于对照组,组间差异显著(P<0.05)。结论应用舒芬太尼对接受手术治疗的急诊外伤疾病患者实施麻醉的临床效果非常明显。“,”Objective To apply, fentanyl and ShuFen, the two drugs in the emergency trauma disease treated with surgical treatment of clinical anaesthesia effect comparison research. Methods The surgery treatment of our hospital emergency trauma patients 82 cases, were randomly divided into control group and observation group, an average of 41 cases in each group. Using red fentanyl anaesthesia in patients with control group; On observation group of patients using sufentanil anesthesia. Compared two groups of emergency trauma disease surgery anesthesia effect, narcotic drugs cause of adverse events, postoperative completely wake up time. Results The observation group emergency trauma patients with disease of surgical anesthesia effect was better than control group, significant difference between groups (P<0.05);The anesthetic adverse events causes is less than that of control group, significant difference between groups (P< 0.05); Postoperative wide-awake time significantly shorter than the control group, significant difference between groups (P< 0.05). Conclusion The application of sufentanil on the emergency trauma disease treated with surgical treatment of clinical anaesthesia effect is very obvious.