未經專利權人許可,對實用新型專利產品的使用屬於侵犯專利權一一專利法的這一規定似乎相當容易理解和操作,其中研究和討論的空間也不大,所以學界對專利產品的“使用”沒有給予過多的關注。但是,目前出現的一個眞實案例卻使本應清晰的對“使用”的理解和認定變得撲朔迷離。一、案情與問題王某係專利號爲200520022484.6(全玻璃窗牆)的實用新型專利的專利權人,其授權昆明市萬變窗牆有限責任公司實施該專利,並可以該公司自己的名義在全國範圍內對侵權行爲 Without the permission of the patentee, it is quite easy to understand and operate that the use of the utility model patented product is a patent law that infringes upon the patent right. The space for research and discussion is not large, so the scholarship on the patented product “Use ” did not give too much attention. However, a real case that emerges at the moment has confused the understanding and recognition that should have been clear about “use.” First, the case and the problem Wang is the patent number of 200520022484.6 (full glass window wall) utility model patent patentee, which authorizes the ever-changing window wall limited liability company in Kunming, the implementation of the patent, and the company’s own name Nationwide infringement