论文部分内容阅读
目的观察急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的效果。方法选取2013年5~8月收治的急性心肌梗死患者80例,按照治疗方法的不同分为试验组和对照组各40例。试验组患者采用急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,对照组患者采用溶栓治疗,观察2组患者的临床效果。结果试验组总有效率为95%高于对照组的82.5%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组心功能改善状况及住院时间明显优于对照组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在进行急性心肌梗死的治疗中采用经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,具有更好的治疗效果和较高的安全性,并且患者出现的不良反应少,值得临床推广和应用。
Objective To observe the effect of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods Eighty patients with acute myocardial infarction who were admitted from May to August in 2013 were divided into experimental group and control group according to the different treatment methods. The patients in the experimental group were treated with emergency percutaneous coronary intervention and the patients in the control group were treated with thrombolytic therapy. The clinical effects of the two groups were observed. Results The total effective rate of the experimental group was 95% higher than 82.5% of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The improvement of cardiac function and hospital stay in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion Percutaneous coronary intervention in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction has better therapeutic effect and higher safety, and the patient has fewer adverse reactions, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.