2010年年底,某地教育部门发出一则通知,要求中小学校在开展经典诵读活动时,不可不加选择地全文推荐如《弟子规》《三字经》《神童诗》等内容,要有删节地让学生读。通知一出台,即刻引起广泛关注。有人质疑,删了的经典还叫经典吗?也有人质疑,删的或许是糟粕,没删的就一定是精华吗?支持的人则说,时代在变,对那些不合时宜的内容加以删改,使它们更具有时代精神,这是好事。本刊发表两种交锋意见,希望读者能思考,为了青少年学生的健康成长,我们到底该采取怎样的方式?我们不希望我们的青少年心中装着封建的糟粕,我们又希望青少年有鉴别力和免疫力,能够识别香花与毒草,在这个看似矛盾的情境下,到底该采取怎样的办法? At the end of 2010, a local education department issued a circular calling on primary and secondary schools to recommend content such as “Disciple Rules”, “Three Character Classic Scriptures” and “Prodigy Poems” in their entirety while conducting classical recitation activities. Students read. Notification of a launch, immediately aroused widespread concern. Some people doubt that the classic is also called a classic delete? Some people have questioned the deletion may be dross, did not delete it must be the essence of it? Support for those who say that the times are changing, those outdated content to be deleted, so that They are more spirit of the times. This is a good thing. We published two kinds of confrontations and expressed our hope that readers will be able to think about what we should do for the healthy growth of young students. We do not want our young people to have feudal dregs in their hearts. We also hope that adolescents have the ability to discriminate and immunity , Can identify incense and poison grass, in this seemingly contradictory situation, in the end what kind of approach?