论文部分内容阅读
从历史的维度梳理法哲学领域关于“正当性”与“合法性”的争论,逻辑领域关于“合理性”与推理“正当性”的争论、伦理领域关于行为“正当性”标准的争论,一方面以主要学者的代表性观点为线索演示“正当性”在上述学科领域的内涵变化并做出评价,另一方面试图在分析历史争论的基础上,抽象出“正当性”内涵分歧(不同学科领域和同一学科领域内部)的统一实质,即事实与价值的关系问题,并认为尽管事实与价值在一定程度上存在断裂,但在属人的领域,必须对事实进行价值追问。
From the perspective of history, the author argues that the controversy over “legitimacy ” and “legitimacy ” in the area of legal philosophy, the controversy over “rationality” and “reasoning ” in the field of logic, On the one hand, the dissertation discusses the connotation changes of “legitimacy ” in the above subject areas on the basis of the representative scholars’ viewpoints, and on the other hand, attempts to analyze the historical controversy , Abstract the unity essence of “legitimacy” connotation disagreement (between different subject areas and the same subject area), that is, the relationship between fact and value, and holds that although facts and values are to some extent broken down, The realm of value must be questioned.