论文部分内容阅读
记得前几年评选好新闻,一般都是先由读者推荐,然后再由专门班子评议。这样评出来的好新闻,具有广泛的群众性。可是,近几年来,有些新闻单位却“一反常态”,把广大读者拒之门外,关起门来进行评选。这样评出来的好新闻,往往缺乏广泛的群众性,评出来的好新闻,大都是记者写的稿子,通讯员稿件占的比例很小,只不过是“陪衬”而已。须知,对报纸工作最有发言权的是广大的读者。哪篇新闻好,哪篇新闻不好,哪篇稿子一般化,读者的心中是有数的。如1981年,当全国好新闻评选工作正在进行的时候,评委会收到一封来自湖北大悟县丰店公社署名“钟野”的来信。信
I remember a few years ago selected a good news, are generally recommended by the reader first, and then reviewed by the special team. The good news so commented is broad mass. However, in recent years some news organizations have been “uncharacteristically”, turning readers away from the door and closing the door for selection. The good news so appraised often lacked extensive mass. The good news appraised by them was mostly the manuscripts written by reporters. The proportion of manuscripts contributed by correspondents was small and only “foil”. Notice, the majority of newspaper readers the right to speak. Which news is good, which news is not good, which articles generalization, the reader’s mind is good. For example, in 1981, when a good news appraisal for the whole country was under way, the jury received a letter from Zhong Ye, a copy of Fengdian Commune, Dawu County, Hubei Province. letter