游叙弗伦关于虔敬的定义一般被认为是不成功的。很多学者把他归为一个无知的宗教狂热者,也把他的伦理学思想界定为一种神意论的,即以神意为道德奠基的立场。本文则认为游叙弗伦在立场上是接近苏格拉底的。虽然他强调神意对于道德生活的重要性,但他始终围绕着“正义”来界定虔敬,这与苏格拉底的立场是一致的。 Syracuse’s definition of godliness is generally considered unsuccessful. Many scholars classified him as an ignorant religious fan, and also defined his ethical thinking as a divinely assertive, that is, the moral ground for laying ground for morality. This article argues that Syracuse is close to Socrates in his position. Although he emphasized the importance of divine mind to moral life, he always defined godliness around “justice”, which is consistent with Socrates’ position.