读了《人民检察》１９９９年第４期刊出的讨论案例后，笔者倾向于第三种意见，认为罗某的行为构成侵犯商业秘密罪。理由如下：一、罗某的行为不构成盗窃罪。盗窃罪是指以非法占有为目的，秘密窃取公私财物，数额较大或者多次窃取的行为。本案中的罗某尽管在主观上有非法占... After reading the discussion articles published in the People’s Procuratorate, No. 4, 1999, the author prefers a third opinion that Luomou’s behavior constitutes a crime of infringing trade secrets. The reasons are as follows: First, Luomou’s conduct does not constitute a theft. Theft refers to the act of secretly stealing public or private property for a purpose of illegal possession, involving a large amount or multiple theft. In this case, despite the subjective subjective illegitimate account of Luomou ...