在勒内·吉拉尔所提出的“替罪羊”机制的迫害范式下同时运作《一支给埃米莉的玫瑰》与《爸爸爸》,对比二者在结局是否将“替罪羊”神圣化不同的差异性。探究造成文本差异性的原因,一方面是由于吉拉尔“替罪羊”机制的局限性限制,另一方面是也由于在不同文化处境下,两个文本宗旨不同,造成了作家对相同主题文本的不同建构。并根据以上个例的文本分析,以此来窥测中西方文本之间产生的差异性的文化内涵。 In the same persecution paradigm proposed by Rene Gillal for the “scapegoat” system, “a rose for Emily” and “daddy daddy” were both operated to see whether the two would “scapegoat” Differences of divine sanctions. To explore the causes of the text differences is partly due to the limitations of the mechanism of the “scapegoat” of the Girardeau and also because of the different purposes of the two texts in different cultural situations, Different constructions of the text. And according to the textual analysis of the above examples, we can get a glimpse of the cultural connotation of differences between Chinese and Western texts.