论文部分内容阅读
西夏《天盛律令》是在大量已有专门法的基础上进行编纂的。这些专门法往往是律令执行和判断的依据。《天盛律令》的条目、条理规范既不能与同时期的宋金相比,也不能与元明清相比,因而也就很难说其分类清楚、条目清楚、条理规范,更谈不到简便易行。西夏修律未能仿效唐宋律,先立纲领以为全部律条的馆辖,笔者以为是西夏的政治、经济、行政等制度在客观上没有达到宋金元明清发展的那种高度和完备程度所致。宋金元明清法典“律文”的地位不轻易变动,始终是居于首要位置,而《天盛律令》将律(勅)令兼用并书,不以律文为总纲,而大量的专门法也是就事论事,所以也就不能按律分总门,决定其只能就事按别门分类。这从一个侧面说明,西夏法典的不成熟。
The law of Tiansheng in the Western Xia Dynasty was compiled on the basis of a large number of existing specialized laws. These specialized laws are often the basis for enforcing and judging the law. The rules and regulations of Tiansheng Law Order can neither be compared with the Song and Jin Dynasties nor with the Yuan, Ming and Qing Dynasties. Therefore, it is hard to say that their classification is clear, the articles are clear, the rules are well regulated, and the more simple and easy . The cultivation of Xixia did not imitate the laws of Tang and Song Dynasties, and first set the program as the hall of jurisdiction of all the laws. The author thinks that the system of politics, economy and administration of Xixia does not objectively reach the height and completeness of the development of Ming and Qing Dynasties in Song and Jin Dynasties . Song Jin Yuan Ming and Qing Dynasties “law ” status does not change easily, always is the primary position, and “Tiansheng law” will law (敕) order and use the book, not the law as the general outline, and a large number of specialized law It is also a matter of fact, so it can not be the total law, decided that it can only do things according to different categories. This shows from one side, the immature Xixia Code.