译者注:本文是译者在宾夕法尼亚大学法学院访学过程中发现的一篇力作,之后在访问耶鲁大学法学院期间,译者有幸参与了一次关于“美国联邦主义,公共选择理论以及经济调控”的主题沙龙,之后更坚定了向国内经济法学界介绍美国在国家协调市场经济运行的最新相关学术思潮的想法。本文集中反映了卢瑞兹(Revesz)教授运用多种研究方法对美国法学界中“中央派”与“自由派”学者意见的一次总的梳理与反思。作者认为在美国当前的联邦主义国体下,对美国联邦政府干预各州的环境治理及其他经济调控过程的行为应采取慎重态度。作者从分析美国法学界流行的“管制解体理论”、“州际外部性理论”、“公共选择理论”入手,对 Translator’s Note: This article is a translator found in Pennsylvania University School of Law during the visit to a masterpiece, after visiting Yale Law School, the translator was fortunate enough to participate in a “United States federalism, public choice theory and the economy Control ”the theme of salon, then more firmly to the domestic economic jurisprudence to introduce the United States in the country to coordinate the operation of the market economy, the latest academic thought ideas. This paper focuses on a general review and reflection of Professor Revesz’s use of various research methods on the opinions of the “central faction” and “liberal” scholars in American jurisprudence. The author believes that under the current federalism in the United States, the United States should take a cautious attitude toward the interference of the federal government in environmental governance and other economic control processes in all states. The author starts with the analysis of the popular theory of “disintegration of regulation”, “theory of interstate externalities” and “theory of public choice” in American jurisprudence