论文部分内容阅读
徐海鹰撰文说,1985年5月提出的关于教育体制改革的《决定》,由于没有从根本上对建国以来的教育体制,尤其是对“文革”前17年的教育体制进行历史的分析和深刻的反思,致使这一改革思路本身存在着明显的缺陷: 第一,教育体制改革的总体目标不清楚。《决定》没有提出把适应产品经济的教育体制如何转变为适应商品经济的教育体制,结果,实际上回避了教育体制改革与经济体制改革的内在联系。第二,教育体制改革的具体目标也相当模糊。诸如《决定》中所说的“加强宏现管理”的具体涵义,
Xu Haiying wrote that the “decision” on education system reform put forward in May 1985 failed to conduct a historical analysis of the education system since the founding of the People’s Republic of China, especially the education system of the first 17 years of “Cultural Revolution” and profound Reflection, resulting in the reform of the thinking itself there are obvious flaws: First, the overall goal of education system reform is not clear. The Decision did not propose how to transform the education system that adapts to the product economy into an education system that is adapted to the commodity economy. As a result, the internal ties between the education system reform and the economic system reform are virtually avoided. Second, the specific goals of education system reform are quite vague. Such as “decision” referred to as “strengthening the management of macro” specific meaning,