论文部分内容阅读
2003年12月21日,北京消费者李冰在持票进入华星国际影城放映大厅观看《手机》时, 被检票人员拦住,以其所带饮料非影城所售为由,拒绝他自带饮料入场。李冰诉至法院,认为消费选择权是消费者的基本权利之一,华星公司所经营的华星国际影城禁止观众外带饮料和食品的店规,严重侵犯了消费者的正当权益,要求赔偿其购票款及交通费145元, 赔礼道歉并撤销不合理规定。2004年9月27日,北京市海淀区人民法院一审判决驳回了其诉讼请求后,李冰向北京市一中院提起上诉。2005年6月22日,北京市第一中级人民法院作出终审判决:影院禁止消费者自带饮品的行为不构成对消费者权益的侵犯,驳回李冰要求退票、赔偿损失,并赔礼道歉的诉讼请求。
On December 21, 2003, when Li Bing, a Beijing consumer, viewed the “mobile phone” while entering the screening hall of Huaxing International Cinema, he was stopped by the ticket inspectors and refused to bring his own drinks Admission Li Bing sued the court that consumer choice is one of consumers ’basic rights. Huaxing International Cinema, operated by Huaxing Company, prohibits spectators from taking out drinks and foodstuffs, taking a serious violation of consumers’ legitimate rights and interests and seeking compensation Purchase tickets and transport costs 145 yuan, apologize and cancel the unreasonable provisions. September 27, 2004, Beijing Haidian District People’s Court of First Instance ruling dismissed its claim, Li Bing, Beijing Intermediate People’s Court filed an appeal. On June 22, 2005, Beijing No.1 Intermediate People’s Court made a final judgment: the cinema’s banning of customers ’own drinks does not constitute an infringement of consumers’ rights and interests, dismisses Li Bing’s request for refund, compensation for damages and apology for apology .