论文部分内容阅读
我们自1983年以来,参照创伤性方法的原理,用无创性经食道起搏技术对100余例患者的快速心律失常用不同的起搏方式进行对比研究,认为以超速抑制及短阵爆破式起搏二者最为有效。由于该技术在临床上操作极为简易,绝大部分 PSVT 患者均乐于接受这种治疗方案,尤其是经常发作持续性 PSVT 的患者,一经发作则可及时得以治疗,不致贻误时机。此外,该技术还可弥补以往基层医务人员出诊治疗时仪器携带不便,以及部分顽固性 PSVT 患者不易由药物转复的不足。
Since 1983, we have used noninvasive transoesophageal pacing techniques to compare the tachyarrhythmias of more than 100 patients with different pacing methods based on the principle of traumatic approach since 1983, The two most effective stroke. As the technology is extremely easy to operate clinically, most PSVT patients are willing to accept this treatment, especially in patients with persistent PSVT. Once the episode occurs, they can be treated promptly without any delay. In addition, the technology can also make up for the inconvenience of carrying medical equipment in the past when medical staff at the grass-roots level visited the hospital and the patients with some refractory PSVT are not easy to be transfused by drugs.