《芮良夫毖》中的“圣人”特指有威权的诸侯大臣,“彼人”指周厉王,“君子”指普通卿大夫,“君”、“元君”指世族伯长,诸词汇的使用均具早期特点,非战国时之泛称。竹书“和德定刑”的提法与西周早期“明德慎刑”观念一脉相承,且其散韵结合、“诗”“书”合体的文体特点反映了部分“诗”类作品的早期传述状态。竹书当作于西周晚期厉王出奔之后,共和行政之前。学界针对楚简“诗”类文献所提出的“战国虚构说”尚可商榷。竹书主旨直斥周厉王已无资格为王,主张征召有威权的诸侯伯长入主朝政,实为“共和行政”张本。竹书反映了西周晚期世族势力勃兴,家臣制度完善,世族之间矛盾丛生的历史情实,同时反映了西周晚期王权观念的重大改变。 “Sage ” in “Rui Lianfu” refers specifically to the authoritarian princes, “others ” refers to the week of vigorous King, “gentleman ” refers to the general doctor, “ Jun ”refers to the eldest family of chiefs, the use of the various terms are the early characteristics of non-Warring States general term. The formulation of the Bamboo Book “and the German Sentence ” is the same as the concept of “Mingde Priest ” in the early Western Zhou Dynasty, and its combination of scattered rhyme and the stylistic features of “poetic ” “book ”Poetry“ category of the early state of communication. Bamboo book as in the late Western Zhou Dynasty Li Wang went out before the Republican administration. The academic circles put forward ”Fictitious Theory of Warring States“ put forward in the literature of Chu Dynasty ”Shi “ ’s classics is still open to question. The main thrust of the bamboo book is that the king of Zhou Dynasty has no qualifications to be the king, advocating that the princes, chiefs with authoritarian authority, should rule the DPRK government and act as the ”republican administration". The bamboo books reflect the historical facts that the development of the clan forces in the late Western Zhou Dynasty was prosperous, the system of merchant-officials was perfect, and the clashes between the clan and clan came together. At the same time, it reflected the significant change in the concept of monarchical power in the late Western Zhou Dynasty.