论文部分内容阅读
轻兵器,顾名思义,一定要轻,否则非也。然物质总是有质量的,更何况以金属为主打造的兵器。既然轻兵器一定要轻,那么轻到什么程度呢?回答这个问题并不难:我以为轻到人员能够较为轻松自如地以徒手“搬得动”、“扛得起”、“舞得开”、“端得住”、“盘得走”是也。既然如此,是不是越轻越好呢?回答这个问题却很不容易。轻兵器一定要轻,却不见得越轻越好。两个问题同为一个“轻”字,却有两个不同的前提条件。首先,“轻兵器一定要轻”,是强调包括武器(发射器)及其所配弹药在内的轻武器系统整体上体积尽可能小,质量一定要轻,而不是仅仅指系统中的某一部分轻。其内涵又包括两个方面。
Light weapons, as the name suggests, must be light, or not. However, material always has quality, not to mention metal-based weapons. Since the light weapons must be light, so light to what extent? To answer this question is not difficult: I think the light to the staff to be able to more easily and easily “move”, “affordable”, “dance was open” , “End to live”, “disc go” is also. In that case, is not the lighter the better? To answer this question is not easy. Light weapons must be light, but not necessarily the lighter the better. The two problems are the same as a “light”, but there are two different prerequisites. First of all, “light weapons must be light” emphasizes that the overall size of a light weapons system, including weapons (launchers) and their associated ammunition, should be as small in size as possible and of a lighter quality than just some part of the system . Its connotation also includes two aspects.