本文对赵宏和邵志洪 (2 0 0 2 )“句内后照应单向性”论点的有效性提出质疑。目的在于 ,利用语言实据比较它与西方理论对第三人称代词后照应条件阐释的异同 ,以辨明几个有关人称代词后照应的事实。文章主要包括 :第三人称代词后照应制约条件 ;复合句的“基本句”与“变体” ;超句后照应 This article questions the validity of Zhao’s and Shao Zhihong’s (2002) “unilateralism in sentence”. The purpose is to compare the similarities and differences between it and Western theories in explaining the conditions of third-person pronouns after the use of linguistic evidence in order to discern several facts about personal pronouns. The article mainly includes: the third person pronouns should be conditioned after the conditions; “basic sentence” and “variant” of compound sentences;